Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elisa Camahort Page's avatar

I think this is very in line with what we talked about in a conversationality a few weeks ago, how employees actually cite proper compensation, respected boundaries, and respectful communications as more important to their actual mental health and well-being than some of the programs companies institute or pay for. As a manager, I think there are two things I try to live by that are really good for my teams. 1. I believe in public praise and private critique whenever possible. It’s so toxic to see leaders or managers tear down people in their chain of command in front of other team members 2. I believe in giving credit to the team when things go well and taking the ownership when things do not. The worst boss I ever had to the opposite. He took all the credit when things went well, and threw the team under the bus when things did not go well. I vowed 20 years ago to not be that guy.

Expand full comment
Julie Des Jardins's avatar

If people are curious, the idea of psychological safety Jory cites was first conceived by Amy Edmondson at Harvard Business School, who was trying to understand why medical teams that looked to be making more mistakes were actually better, more effective teams. It seemed counterintuitive, but what her data was telling her was not that successful teams necessarily made more mistakes, they were just reporting them more--to each other, which thwarted small mistakes from becoming bigger ones. Edmondson decided that the IT factor on those teams was Psychological Safety, which is when people feel like they can take risks, ask questions, and make mistakes--and not fear negative repercussions. Creating an environment where people can fail forward is key to a team's success and well being.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts